The Agreement Level of Colorimetric Indicator Paper and pH Meter Examination Compared to Urine Analyzer in Measuring Exudative Pleural Effusion Fluid pH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36497/jri.v46i2.1086Keywords:
colorimetric urine analyzer, exudative pleural fluid pH, indicator paper, pH meterAbstract
Background: Pleural effusion is an abnormal accumulation of fluid in the pleural space, commonly associated with pulmonary infections and malignancies. Measurement of pleural fluid pH is necessary for diagnosis, therapeutic decision-making, and prognostic evaluation. Multiple methods are used, including pH meters, indicator papers, and urine analyzers, but their concordance has not been widely studied in Indonesia. This study aimed to assess the agreement of pleural fluid pH results measured using pH meters, indicator papers, and urine analyzers to support the appropriate selection of diagnostic methods.
Methods: This observational analytic study with a cross-sectional design was conducted at dr. Moewardi General Hospital, Surakarta, from February to June 2025. The sample consisted of 55 patients with exudative pleural effusion who met the inclusion criteria. Pleural fluid pH was measured using three methods: colorimetric indicator paper, a pH meter, and a urine analyzer. Data were analyzed using the Kappa coefficient and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) to assess the agreement between methods.
Results: The mean pH values of pleural fluid measured by the urine analyzer, pH meter, and colorimetric indicator paper were 8.18±0.47, 8.13±0.46, and 8.15±0.59, respectively. Agreement analysis showed a very strong and statistically significant correlation between the pH meter and urine analyzer (ICC=0.948; P<0.001), between the pH strip and urine analyzer (ICC=0.855; P<0.001), and between the pH meter and pH strip (ICC=0.916; P<0.001). A significant positive correlation was also observed between glucose levels and pH measured by both the urine analyzer and the pH meter.
Conclusion: There is good agreement among pH measurements obtained using colorimetric indicator paper, urine analyzer, and pH meter in exudative pleural effusion fluid.
Downloads
References
1. Bhatnagar R, Maskell N. The modern diagnosis and management of pleural effusions. BMJ. 2015;351:h4520.
2. Light RW. Pleural Diseases, Sixth Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (LWW); 2013.
3. Li C, Kazzaz FI, Scoon JM, Estrada-Y-Martin RM, Cherian S V. Lymphocyte predominant exudative pleural effusions: a narrative review. Shanghai Chest. 2022;6:5.
4. Porcel JM, Bielsa S, Esquerda A, Ruiz-González A, Falguera M. Pleural fluid C-reactive protein contributes to the diagnosis and assessment of severity of parapneumonic effusions. Eur J Intern Med. 2012;23(5):447–50.
5. Sharma S, Arora RD, Boster J. Malignant Pleural Effusion. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024.
6. Chubb SP, Williams RA. Biochemical Analysis of Pleural Fluid and Ascites. Clin Biochem Rev. 2018;39(2):39–50.
7. Sobhey KE, Naglaa BA. Diagnostic significance of pleural fluid pH and pCO2. Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis. 2015;64(4):877–85.
8. Chandler TM, McCoskey EH, Byrd RP, Roy TM. Comparison of the Use and Accuracy of Methods for Determining Pleural Fluid pH. South Med J. 1999;92(2):214–7.
9. Cheng D sheng, Rodriguez RM, Rogers J, Wagster M, Starnes DL, Light RW. Comparison of Pleural Fluid pH Values Obtained Using Blood Gas Machine, pH Meter, and pH Indicator Strip. Chest. 1998;114(5):1368–72.
10. Mohan G, Bhide P, Agrawal A, Kaul V, Chaddha U. A practical approach to pseudoexudative pleural effusions. Respir Med. 2023;214:107279.
11. Ng L, Dabscheck E, Hew M. Diagnosis of complicated parapneumonic effusion by pleural pH measurement is jeopardized by inadequate physician knowledge and guideline-discordant laboratory practice. Respir Med. 2017;122:30–2.
12. Li M, Zeng Y, Li Y, Jia D, Chen S, Wang J. Incidence, aetiology and clinical features of eosinophilic pleural effusion: a retrospective study. BMC Pulm Med. 2021;21:402.
13. Hutagalung NYM, Susilawati, Inggarsih R. Hubungan Karakteristik Klinis dan Etiologi pada Pasien Efusi Pleura di RSUP Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Tahun 2019. Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan : Publikasi Ilmiah Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sriwijaya. 2022;9(3):245–52.
14. Dewi H, Fairuz F. Karakteristik Pasien Efusi Pleura di Kota Jambi. JAMBI MEDICAL JOURNAL “Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan.” 2020;8(1):54–9.
15. Yovi I, Anggraini D, Ammal S. Hubungan Karakteristik dan Etiologi Efusi Pleura di RSUD Arifin Achmad Pekanbaru. J Respirol Indones. 2017;37(2):135–44.
16. Chaudhary A, Desai U, Joshi JM. Venous thromboembolism due to hyperhomocysteinaemia and tuberculosis. Natl Med J India. 2017;30(3):139–41.
17. Sidiq MF, Agustina H, Kulsum ID. Profil Klinis, Gambaran Makroskopis Dan Mikroskopis Cairan Efusi Pleura Pada Pasien Rawat Inap Di Departemen Ilmu Penyakit Dalam Rsup Dr. Hasan Sadikin Bandung Periode Januari 2016-Desember 2018. Indonesia Journal Chest. 2020;7(1):1–10.
18. Amalia RN, Pradjoko I. Nilai Diagnostik Adenosine Deaminase (ADA) Cairan Pleura pada Penderita Efusi Pleura Tuberkulosi. Jurnal Respirasi. 2019;2(2):35–40.
19. Utami RA, Raudah S, Mawardani MT, Lewa OFR. Penanganan Cairan Pleura Pada Penderita Efusi Pleura di Laboratorium Patologi Anatomi. Jurnal Teknologi Laboratorium Medik Borneo. 2024;4(2):53–8.
20. Ferreiro L, Toubes ME, San José ME, Suárez-Antelo J, Golpe A, Valdés L. Advances in pleural effusion diagnostics. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2020;14(1):51–66.
21. Budnick IM, Oliver SF, Barros AJ, Sturek JM. Pleural Fluid Analysis in Neutropenia. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022;19(11):1946–8.
22. Lin L, Li S, Xiong Q, Wang H. A retrospective study on the combined biomarkers and ratios in serum and pleural fluid to distinguish the multiple types of pleural effusion. BMC Pulm Med. 2021;21(1):95.
23. Kho SS, Chan SK, Yong MC, Cheah HM, Lee YG, Tie ST. Pleural fluid lactate as a point-of-care adjunct diagnostic aid to distinguish tuberculous and complicated parapneumonic pleural effusions during initial thoracentesis: Potential use in a tuberculosis endemic setting. Respir Investig. 2020;58(5):367–75.
24. Cho J, Kim YS, Kim YH, Lee JY, Bae IC, Lee SG, et al. Comparison of analytical performance of i-Smart 300 and pHOx ultra for the accurate determination of pleural fluid pH. Pract Lab Med. 2019;14:e00117.
25. Darooei R, Sanadgol G, Gh-Nataj A, Almasnia M, Darivishi A, Eslaminejad A, et al. Discriminating Tuberculous Pleural Effusion from Malignant Pleural Effusion Based on Routine Pleural Fluid Biomarkers, Using Mathematical Methods. Tanaffos. 2017;16(2):157–65.
26. Makwana S, Gohil P, Gabhawala Y. The Role of Pleural Fluid C-Reactive Protein in the Diagnosis of Exudative Pleural Effusions. Cureus. 2022;14(7):e27000.
27. Allama AM, Abou-Elela DH, Ibrahim IM. Pleural and serum markers for diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2020;28(9):560–5.
28. Verma A, Abisheganaden J, Light RW. Identifying Malignant Pleural Effusion by A Cancer Ratio (Serum LDH: Pleural Fluid ADA Ratio). Lung. 2016;194(1):147–53.
29. Zhao T, Zhang J, Zhang X, Wang C. Clinical significance of pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase/adenosine deaminase ratio in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion. BMC Pulm Med. 2024;24(1):241.
30. Farah R, Sidar-Orlin K, Sharabi-Nov A. Characterization of Markers in Blood Tests of Patients with Pleural Effusion and their Correlation to Different Etiologies. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2024;14(5):30–4.
31. Fitzgerald DB, Leong SL, Budgeon CA, Murray K, Rosenstengal A, Smith NA, et al. Relationship of pleural fluid pH and glucose: a multi-centre study of 2,971 cases. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(1):123–30.
32. De Coninck V, Keller EX, Rodríguez-Monsalve M, Doizi S, Audouin M, Haymann JP, et al. Evaluation of a Portable Urinary pH Meter and Reagent Strips. J Endourol. 2018;32(7):647–52.
33. Siu VS, Lu M, Hsieh KY, Wen B, Buleje I, Hinds N, et al. Development of a Quantitative Digital Urinalysis Tool for Detection of Nitrite, Protein, Creatinine, and pH. Biosensors (Basel). 2024;14(2):70.
34. Phukpattanachai K, Praditseree N, Skjolaas S, Klaychaiya S, Trongtrakul K. Accuracy of pH strip testing and pH liquid testing versus standard pH meter of gastric contents in critically ill patients: a diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ Open. 2024;14(7):e081830.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muttaqin Huda, Yusup Subagio Sutanto, Jatu Aphridasari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- The authors own the copyright of published articles. Nevertheless, Jurnal Respirologi Indonesia has the first-to-publish license for the publication material.
- Jurnal Respirologi Indonesia has the right to archive, change the format and republish published articles by presenting the authors’ names.
- Articles are published electronically for open access and online for educational, research, and archiving purposes. Jurnal Respirologi Indonesia is not responsible for any copyright issues that might emerge from using any article except for the previous three purposes.
