The Difference in Serum Levels of IP-10 in Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients with Positive AFB and AFB Conversion

Authors

  • Said Muchsin Department Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Herry Priyanto Department Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Teuku Zulfikar Department Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Novita Andayani Department Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Budi Yanti Department Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Ferry Dwi Kurniawan Department Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36497/jri.v40i3.358

Keywords:

AFB, IP-10, Pulmonary tuberculosis

Abstract

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which most commonly infects the lungs. Diagnostic modalities are required in smear-negative TB. IP-10 is a potent chemokine for detecting the presence of TB infection. This study aimed to determine the difference in serum IP-10 levels in patients with smear-positive pulmonary TB and pulmonary TB patients with AFB conversion after two months of therapy.

Methods: This was an analytic observational study with a cross-sectional approach. Sampling was carried out by consecutive sampling methods. AFB examination was performed using Ziehl-Neelsen staining, and serum IP-10 was measured using ELISA.

Results: The study results obtained mean IP-10 levels in TB patients with smear positive and AFB conversion after two months of treatment of 459 pg/mL and 204.4 pg/mL, respectively. Statistical analysis using independent t-test received P<0.0001. The optimal cut-off value was 306,1 pg/ml (90% sensitivity; 95% specificity; area under the curve: 0.948, 95% CI=0.88-1; P=0.0001).

Conclusion: There was a significant difference between IP-10 levels in TB patients with smear positive and AFB conversion

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Health Organization. Tuberculosis [Internet]. World Health Organization. 2020 [cited 2020 Mar 25]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/tuberculosis#tab=tab_1

World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2019 [Internet]. World Health Organization. Geneva; 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565714

Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Pusat Data dan Informasi Tuberculosis. Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2018.

Metcalfe JZ, Everett CK, Steingart KR, Cattamanchi A, Huang L, Hopewell PC, et al. Interferon-γ release assays for active pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis in adults in low-and middle-income countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect Dis. 2011;204(SUPPL. 4):S1120–S1129.

Petrone L, Vanini V, Chiacchio T, Petruccioli E, Cuzzi G, Schininà V, et al. Evaluation of IP-10 in Quantiferon-Plus as biomarker for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2018;111:147–53.

Tonby K, Ruhwald M, Kvale D, Dyrhol-Riise AM. IP-10 measured by Dry Plasma Spots as biomarker for therapy responses in Mycobacterium Tuberculosis infection. Sci Rep. 2015;5:1–6.

Guo SJ, Jia LQ, Hu QJ, Long HY, Pang CS, Wen FQ. Diagnostic accuracy of interferon gamma-induced protein 10 for tuberculosis: A meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7(1):93–100.

Goletti D, Petruccioli E, Joosten SA, Ottenhoff THM. Tuberculosis biomarkers: From diagnosis to protection. Infect Dis Rep. 2016;8(2):24–32.

Petrone L, Cannas A, Aloi F, Nsubuga M, Sserumkuma J, Nazziwa RA, et al. Can blood or urine IP-10 discriminate between active and no active tuberculosis in children? 2015;2015:PA3635.

Ruhwald M, Ravn P. Biomarkers of latent TB infection. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2009;3(4):387–401.

Narumi S, Takeuchi T, Kobayashi Y, Konishi K. Serum levels of IFN-inducible protein-10 relating to the activity of systemic lupus erythematosus. Cytokine. 2000;12(10):1561–5.

Ragusa F, Fallahi P. IP-10 in occupational asthma: Review of the literature and case-control study. Clin Ter. 2017;168(2):151–7.

Liu M, Guo S, Hibbert JM, Jain V, Singh N, Wilson NO, et al. CXCL10/IP-10 in infectious diseases pathogenesis and potential therapeutic implications. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2011;22(3):121–30.

Hong JY, Jung GS, Kim H, Kim YM, Lee HJ, Cho SN, et al. Efficacy of inducible protein 10 as a biomarker for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Int J Infect Dis. 2012;16(12):e855–9.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-11

Issue

Section

Original Article

Similar Articles

1-10 of 149

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>